Read the statement on freedom of expression and policy on event disruptions »
May 22, 3:00 PM – 4:30 PM
Robertson Hall, Bowl 002
Immigration was a major focus of the first 100 days of the Trump administration. Higher education institutions around the country felt the impact of a rapidly changing, destabilizing policy environment. Visas and visa records (SEVIS), predominantly for students but extending to all categories of university affiliates, were haphazardly terminated; students alleged to have participated in campus activism were ordered to self-deport or face harsh consequences; and, visa holders perceived that they have less security to continue their university programs. One consequence of the uncertainty is that students around the country are making the difficult decision to forego international travel for fear of being unable to return to their universities.
The immigration measures provoked a swift response. Universities intervened on behalf of non-citizen students and faculty in notable cases such as AAUP v. Rubio. In some contexts, including that of Yale, Harvard, Columbia, and Rutgers, universities have made emergency litigation funding available to students or have expanded resources for legal advice and non-legal support on visa-related matters.
This panel will discuss the national landscape, touching on executive policies, recent litigation, and advocacy strategies. It will also discuss the University context, examining how Princeton is impacted, while considering measures that Princeton can adopt to provide legal and non-legal support to non-citizen community members. Finally, the panel will review the strategic tools available to the University, considering lessons from Rutgers’s recent lawsuit. Our panelists are:
The panel will be moderated by Jeremy Zullow ’17, an attorney who is working with a broad coalition at Princeton to improve the collective capacity to meet the evolving needs of Princeton’s international students, faculty, and staff.
Sponsored by P*Law and SPIA in NJ